4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

dose theses numbers sound right

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2013, 03:03 PM
  #1  
02whitestang
Thread Starter
 
02whitestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: tx
Posts: 8
Default dose theses numbers sound right

i was just wondering if this sounds right i have an 02 auto gt and just had to dyno tuned on dynojet. 257hp and 275tq
my mods
bbk intake
75mm tb
c&l Plenum
Typhoon Intake
stage 2 heads 229in 206ex
ex262's
udp
bbk shorties
bbk catted x
weld in flows
3.73
02whitestang is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 04:12 PM
  #2  
TXMach
1st Gear Member
 
TXMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 141
Default

I'd say that sounds about right give or take about 10hp/tq. I'd think you'd make slightly more than that, but there are variables to consider. Generally mileage could have something to do with it because your compression could be down some. But I'd say you're doing fine with those numbers and those mods though. Nice.
TXMach is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 05:06 PM
  #3  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Sounds about right to me--that is around 40 HP more at the wheels than a stock 2V slushbox...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 06:11 PM
  #4  
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,696
Default

Those numbers are about right. I had every bolt on under the sun and made about 265 or so to the rear wheels (N/A). What numbers were you hoping for and what are your future plans for the car? BTW welcome to the forums..
Soldier GT is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 06:59 PM
  #5  
02whitestang
Thread Starter
 
02whitestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: tx
Posts: 8
Default

well i was going to try and stay n/a i was only hoping for 300 or a lil more but i have been reading with a 2v FI is best bang for buck.i wanna kinda keep my mpg in the 20s
02whitestang is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 07:00 PM
  #6  
02whitestang
Thread Starter
 
02whitestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: tx
Posts: 8
Default

but i see alot of these guys pushing these numbers without heads
02whitestang is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 07:27 PM
  #7  
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,696
Default

Originally Posted by 02whitestang
but i see alot of these guys pushing these numbers without heads
What do ou mean? Are you saying that a 2vs pushing 300 to the wheels without aftermarket heads?
Soldier GT is offline  
Old 12-10-2013, 09:24 AM
  #8  
02whitestang
Thread Starter
 
02whitestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: tx
Posts: 8
Default

i seen a few poeple say that unless they were on happy dyno's
02whitestang is offline  
Old 12-10-2013, 09:24 AM
  #9  
02whitestang
Thread Starter
 
02whitestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: tx
Posts: 8
Default

and ty guys for the reply's
02whitestang is offline  
Old 12-10-2013, 10:23 AM
  #10  
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,696
Default

Maybe they meant to the crank. No way a 2vs gonna reach 300 rwhp without either some time of FI or head and cam work.
Soldier GT is offline  


Quick Reply: dose theses numbers sound right



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.